Polymeric coating: Difference between revisions

From IcingWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Novia (talk | contribs)
543 edits
No edit summary
Novia (talk | contribs)
543 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Polymer coatings are a choice for icephobic coating.
Polymer coatings are a choice for icephobic coating.
Different composition of polymeric coatings has been applied widely in the different branches of industries.   
Different composition of polymeric coatings has been applied widely in the different branches of industries. Low interactions between the surface and water lead to hydrophobicity of the surface. Hydrophobicity has been discussed to lead to icephobicity of the surface due to low interactions. During freezing, water will penetrate the topography of a surface, which
increases the ice-surface- contact area that increases the ice adhesion strength. Good
icephobic coatings have the proper combination of wettability (hydrophobic or superhydrophobic), suitable surface roughness and low surface free energy. Examples of polymeric coatings are fluorine containing coatings (PTFE), silicone based coatings and silicone rubber.   


During freezing, water will penetrate the topography of a surface, which
increases the ice-surface- contact area that increases the ice adhesion strength.


Good
<ref>T. Bharathidasan, S. V. Kumar, M. S. Bobji, R. P. S. Chakradhar, B. J. Basu, Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces, Applied Surface Science, vol. 314, 2014, pp. 241–250.</ref> <ref>L. Makkonen, Ice Adhesion — Theory , Measurements and Countermeasures, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, vol. 26, 2012, pp. 413–445.</ref> <ref>M. Zou, S. Beckford, R. Wei, C. Ellis, G. Hatton, M. A. Miller, Effects of surface roughness and energy on ice adhesion strength, Applied Surface Science, Vol. 257, No. 8, 2011, pp. 3786–3792.</ref> <ref>S. Farhadi, M. Farzaneh, S. Simard, On Stability and Ice-Releasing Performance of Nanostructured Fluoro-Alkylsilane-Based Superhydrophobic Al alloy2024 Surfaces, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Nanotechnology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp.38-45.</ref> <ref>C. Antonini, M. Innocenti, T. Horn, M. Marengo, A. Amirfazli, Understanding the effect of superhydrophobic coatings on energy reduction in anti-icing systems, Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 1–2, 2011, pp. 58– 67.</ref> <ref>Properties of icephobic surfaces in different icing conditions. Stenroos Christian. Master of Science Thesis. TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. October 2015. Online.</ref> <ref>H. Dodiuk, S. Kenig, A. Dotan, Do Self-cleaning Surfaces Repel Ice ?, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 4–5, 2012, pp. 701–714.</ref> <ref>R. J. Cano, T. M. Smith, C. G. Stevenson, E. C. Martinez, Minimization of Ice Adhesion to Space Shuttle, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 4-5, 2012, pp. 473–503.</ref>
icephobic coatings have the proper combination of wettability (hydrophobic or superhydrophobic), suitable surface roughness and low surface free energy.
 
 
<ref>T. Bharathidasan, S. V. Kumar, M. S. Bobji, R. P. S. Chakradhar, B. J. Basu, Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces, Applied Surface Science, vol. 314, 2014, pp. 241–250.</ref> <ref>L. Makkonen, Ice Adhesion — Theory , Measurements and Countermeasures, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, vol. 26, 2012, pp. 413–445.</ref> <ref>M. Zou, S. Beckford, R. Wei, C. Ellis, G. Hatton, M. A. Miller, Effects of surface roughness and energy on ice adhesion strength, Applied Surface Science, Vol. 257, No. 8, 2011, pp. 3786–3792.</ref> <ref>S. Farhadi, M. Farzaneh, S. Simard, On Stability and Ice-Releasing Performance of Nanostructured Fluoro-Alkylsilane-Based Superhydrophobic Al alloy2024 Surfaces, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Nanotechnology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp.38-45.</ref> <ref>C. Antonini, M. Innocenti, T. Horn, M. Marengo, A. Amirfazli, Understanding the effect of superhydrophobic coatings on energy reduction in anti-icing systems, Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 1–2, 2011, pp. 58– 67.</ref> <ref>Properties of icephobic surfaces in different icing conditions. Stenroos Christian. Master of Science Thesis. TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. October 2015. Online.</ref>

Revision as of 13:16, 18 January 2022

Polymer coatings are a choice for icephobic coating. Different composition of polymeric coatings has been applied widely in the different branches of industries. Low interactions between the surface and water lead to hydrophobicity of the surface. Hydrophobicity has been discussed to lead to icephobicity of the surface due to low interactions. During freezing, water will penetrate the topography of a surface, which increases the ice-surface- contact area that increases the ice adhesion strength. Good icephobic coatings have the proper combination of wettability (hydrophobic or superhydrophobic), suitable surface roughness and low surface free energy. Examples of polymeric coatings are fluorine containing coatings (PTFE), silicone based coatings and silicone rubber.


[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

  1. ↑ T. Bharathidasan, S. V. Kumar, M. S. Bobji, R. P. S. Chakradhar, B. J. Basu, Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces, Applied Surface Science, vol. 314, 2014, pp. 241–250.
  2. ↑ L. Makkonen, Ice Adhesion — Theory , Measurements and Countermeasures, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, vol. 26, 2012, pp. 413–445.
  3. ↑ M. Zou, S. Beckford, R. Wei, C. Ellis, G. Hatton, M. A. Miller, Effects of surface roughness and energy on ice adhesion strength, Applied Surface Science, Vol. 257, No. 8, 2011, pp. 3786–3792.
  4. ↑ S. Farhadi, M. Farzaneh, S. Simard, On Stability and Ice-Releasing Performance of Nanostructured Fluoro-Alkylsilane-Based Superhydrophobic Al alloy2024 Surfaces, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Nanotechnology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp.38-45.
  5. ↑ C. Antonini, M. Innocenti, T. Horn, M. Marengo, A. Amirfazli, Understanding the effect of superhydrophobic coatings on energy reduction in anti-icing systems, Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 1–2, 2011, pp. 58– 67.
  6. ↑ Properties of icephobic surfaces in different icing conditions. Stenroos Christian. Master of Science Thesis. TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. October 2015. Online.
  7. ↑ H. Dodiuk, S. Kenig, A. Dotan, Do Self-cleaning Surfaces Repel Ice ?, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 4–5, 2012, pp. 701–714.
  8. ↑ R. J. Cano, T. M. Smith, C. G. Stevenson, E. C. Martinez, Minimization of Ice Adhesion to Space Shuttle, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 4-5, 2012, pp. 473–503.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.icingcentre.eu/index.php?title=Polymeric_coating&oldid=704"