Microroughness and nanoroughness: Difference between revisions

From IcingWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Novia (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Novia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Micro and nano.jpg|thumb|462x462px|Schematic presentation of microroughness and nanoroughness on the top of microroughness. <ref>Properties of icephobic surfaces in different icing conditions. Stenroos Christian. Master of Science Thesis. TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. October 2015. Online.</ref>]]
[[File:Micro and nano.jpg|thumb|462x462px|Schematic presentation of microroughness and nanoroughness on the top of microroughness. <ref>Properties of icephobic surfaces in different icing conditions. Stenroos Christian. Master of Science Thesis. TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. October 2015. Online.</ref>]]
The roughness of an superhydrophobic (water repelling) surface contains two types of roughnesses; microroughness and nanoroughness. Microroughness forms the overall topography of the surface and nanoroughness is located on the top of microroughness.  
The roughness of an [[Superhydrophobic surface|superhydrophobic (water repelling) surface]] contains two types of roughnesses; microroughness and nanoroughness. Microroughness forms the overall topography of the surface and nanoroughness is located on the top of microroughness.  


Mechanical destruction of the surface roughness will diminish the superhydrophobicity of the surface, which can increase the ice adhesion considerably.
Mechanical destruction of the surface roughness will diminish the superhydrophobicity of the surface, which can increase the ice adhesion considerably.

Revision as of 12:58, 18 January 2022

Schematic presentation of microroughness and nanoroughness on the top of microroughness. [1]

The roughness of an superhydrophobic (water repelling) surface contains two types of roughnesses; microroughness and nanoroughness. Microroughness forms the overall topography of the surface and nanoroughness is located on the top of microroughness.

Mechanical destruction of the surface roughness will diminish the superhydrophobicity of the surface, which can increase the ice adhesion considerably.


More on this topic:

superhydrophobic surface,

coating material,

ice-phobic surface,

polymeric coating


[2] [3] [4]

  1. Properties of icephobic surfaces in different icing conditions. Stenroos Christian. Master of Science Thesis. TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. October 2015. Online.
  2. S. Farhadi, M. Farzaneh, S. A. Kulinich, Anti-icing performance of superhydrophobic surfaces, Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 14, 2011, pp. 6264–6269.
  3. S. a Kulinich, S. Farhadi, K. Nose, X. W. Du, Superhydrophobic surfaces: are they really ice-repellent?, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2011, pp. 25–29.
  4. J. Chen, J. Liu, M. He, K. Li, D. Cui, Q. Zhang, X. Zeng, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Song, Superhydrophobic surfaces cannot reduce ice adhesion, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 101, No. 11, 2012, p. 111603-1-11603-3.